Understanding Farm Income Divergence in Rural Economy
A Bibliometric Mapping with Evidence on Livestock Sector Dynamics
Keywords:
Bibliometrics, Livestock, Farm income, Divergence, RuralAbstract
This bibliometric study provides an overview of the global literature on the research topics of farm income divergence and the role of livestock as a moderator of income diversification, stabilization, and resilience. Bibliographic records from the Scopus and Web of Science databases were retrieved using an inclusive Boolean query and analysed using the bibliometrix R package (Biblioshiny). After merging, cleaning, and normalizing all the metadata, we present findings based on 1,825 unique publications through performance, collaboration, citation, and conceptual structure analysis. The study observes an upward trend since 1984, an accelerated growth since 2014, a reduction in unit cost, and an increase in efficiency that indicates a mature domain in its productive phase. Raw and citation-based outputs are highest for Agricultural Systems, followed by Sustainability, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, and Food Policy, reflecting disciplinary versus policy focus. Author and institution analyses show concentrated collaboration explains most variance in productivity. For example, ZHANG Y. and WANG J. each wrote many articles but extensively co-author other authors, thus ranking lower in fractionalized output than total output. The leading institutions include the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) and Wageningen University. While the US and China have the enormous majority of national publications, other countries like the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Australia are cited more frequently for a smaller overall contribution. In terms of conceptual mapping, poverty alleviation and sustainability and resilience are increasingly utilized for research on income from livestock. Highly cited works such as Barrett (2001), Haggblade (2010), and Zhou (2020) serve as intellectual anchors of the field. Overall, the findings demonstrate a mature, interdisciplinary, and progressively globalized knowledge domain shaped by collaborative networks and growing attention to equity and resilience in agricultural livelihoods.
References
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., & Webb, P. (2001). Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa. Food Policy, 26(4), 315–331.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00014-8
Birthal, P. S., Chand, R., Joshi, P. K., & Saxena, R. (2019). Doubling farmers’ income: Sources, drivers, and policy implications. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 32(1), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2019.00001.7
Birthal, P. S., & Joshi, P. K. (2007). Diversification in Indian agriculture towards high-value crops. Agricultural Economics, 37(1), 81–93.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00238.x
Delgado, C. L., Rosegrant, M. W., Steinfeld, H., Ehui, S., & Courbois, C. (2001). Livestock to 2020: The next food revolution. International Food Policy Research Institute.
Dercon, S. (2002). Income risk, coping strategies, and safety nets. World Bank Research Observer, 17(2), 141–166.
https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/17.2.141
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press.
Haggblade, S., Hazell, P., & Reardon, T. (2010). The rural nonfarm economy: Prospects for growth and poverty reduction. World Development, 38(10), 1429–1441.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.008
Herrero, M., Havlík, P., Valin, H., et al. (2013). Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(52), 20888–20893.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308149110
OECD. (2018). Income risk management in agriculture. OECD Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264303161
Reardon, T., Berdegué, J., Barrett, C. B., & Stamoulis, K. (2007). Household income diversification into rural nonfarm activities. World Development, 35(5), 753–779.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.10.018
Ryschawy, J., Choisis, N., Choisis, J. P., Gibon, A., & Hubert, B. (2012). Mixed crop-livestock systems: An economic and environmentally friendly way of farming? Animal, 6(10), 1722–1730.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112000675
Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis (IDS Working Paper No. 72). Institute of Development Studies.
Thornton, P. K., Herrero, M., Freeman, H. A., et al. (2010). Livestock production: Recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2853–2867.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134
Thornton, P. K., van de Steeg, J., Notenbaert, A., & Herrero, M. (2009). The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries. Agricultural Systems, 101(3), 113–127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2009.05.002
World Bank. (2020). Agriculture and food global practice: Income resilience and rural livelihoods. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Studies in Dynamics and Change (JSDC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Readers and users of the Journal of Studies in Dynamics and Change (JSDC) are free to Share — copy and redistribute the papers published in the journal in any medium or format. However, the user (1) must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. (2) May not use the material for commercial purposes (3) Must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original if any remix, transform, or build upon the material is done.