Morphology and Cultural Interpretation of Baigani Kinship Terminology

A Comparative Study with Hindi and Marathi

Authors

  • Niteenkumar Janbaji Ramteke Interpreter and Translator, Sarvadnya Shri chakradhar Swami Marathi Bhasha Tatha Tatwagyan Adhyayan Kendra, Riddhapur (Amravati) , centre of Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya, Wardha (Maharashtra)
  • T. V. Kattimani Former Vice Chancellor , IGNTU , Amarakantak
  • Ranju Hasini Sahoo Former Head Dept. of Sociology and Social Anthropology Former Dean , Faculty of Social Sciences Indira Gandhi National Tribal University Amarkantak - 484 886 Madhya Pradesh , India https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1044-1836

Keywords:

Baigani, Ethnographic, Consanguineous, Cross-cousin marriage, Morphology

Abstract

Baigani is one of the endangered languages of the Baiga community, a PVTG of Central India. In this paper, an attempt is made to explore the structure and content of kinship terms among the Baiga tribe, to identify similarities with the Indo-Aryan languages, i.e., Hindi and Marathi. Kinship terminology has been an interesting phenomenon for both Linguistics and Anthropology. Based on the ethnographic field work of the 23 Baiga villages of  Pushparajgarh block of Annuppur district of Madhya Pradesh, and applying the tools and techniques of  Questionnaire and semi-structured interview, observation, and transcription, the interdisciplinary paper found out some interesting results about the cultural Interpretation of the morphology of the Baigani language, which has bridged the gap between linguistics and Anthropology. The morphology of the Baiga language supported  the Anthropological analysis of its classificatory and descriptive Kinship terminology, corroborating earlier research that, like Tamil Kallar and the Dravidian communities of South India, bilateral cross-cousin marriage is prevalent in the Baiga community.

Author Biographies

Niteenkumar Janbaji Ramteke, Interpreter and Translator, Sarvadnya Shri chakradhar Swami Marathi Bhasha Tatha Tatwagyan Adhyayan Kendra, Riddhapur (Amravati) , centre of Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya, Wardha (Maharashtra)

Interpreter and Translator, Sarvadnya Shri chakradhar Swami Marathi Bhasha Tatha Tatwagyan Adhyayan Kendra, Riddhapur (Amravati) , centre of Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya, Wardha (Maharashtra)

T. V. Kattimani , Former Vice Chancellor , IGNTU , Amarakantak

Former Vice Chancellor , IGNTU , Amarakantak

Ranju Hasini Sahoo, Former Head Dept. of Sociology and Social Anthropology Former Dean , Faculty of Social Sciences Indira Gandhi National Tribal University Amarkantak - 484 886 Madhya Pradesh , India

Former Head
Dept. of Sociology and Social Anthropology

Former Dean , Faculty of Social Sciences 
Indira Gandhi National Tribal University
Amarkantak - 484 886  Madhya Pradesh , India 

References

Abbi, A. (2001). A manual of linguistic fieldwork and structures of Indian languages. Lincom Europa.

Bennardo, G. (2018, July 17). Cultural models theory. Anthropology News. https://doi.org/10.1111/AN.919

Bonvillain, N. (2000). Language, culture and communication: The meaning of messages (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Boruah, D. (2016). A morphological study of Baiga kinship terminology. Language in India, 16(8). https://www.languageinindia.com/aug2016/deepabaigakinship1.pdf-----pls

Bsilki, A. K. (2017). A sociolinguistic analysis of kinship terms in Likpakpaln (Konkomba). Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 6(3), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.4314/gil.v6i3.2

D’Andrade, R. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge University Press.

Deccan College (Deemed University), Pune, & Rajya Marathi Vikas Sanstha, Mumbai. (n.d.-a). Ego’s father’s elder brother, ego’s father’s younger brother, ego’s father’s elder brother’s wife, ego’s father’s younger brother’s wife. Survey of Dialects of Marathi Language. Retrieved August 23, 2026, from https://sdml.ac.in/blog-Ego%20father%20elder%20brotherDhongde, S. (2013). Survey of dialects of Marathi language. http://sdml.ac.in

Deccan College (Deemed University), Pune, & Rajya Marathi Vikas Sanstha, Mumbai. (n.d.-b). Husband’s mother’s brother. Survey of Dialects of Marathi Language. Retrieved August 23, 2026, from https://sdml.ac.in/blog-Husband%20mother%20brotherDumont, L. (1968). Marriage alliance. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 19–23). Macmillan & Free Press.

Dumont, L. (1985). Affinity as a value: Marriage alliance in South India. University of Chicago Press.

Elwin, V. (2007). The Baiga (J. H. Hutton, Foreword). Gyan Publishing House. (Original work published 1939).

Ehrenfels, U. R. (1952). Kadar of Cochin. University of Madras.

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1951). Kinship and marriage among the Nuer. Clarendon Press.

Fasold, R. W., & Connor-Linton, J. (2006). An introduction to language and linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

Fortes, M. (1969). Kinship and the social order: The legacy of Lewis Henry Morgan. Aldine Publishing Company.

Fox, R. (1986). Kinship and marriage: An anthropological perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Fuchs, S. (1960). The Gond and Bhumia of eastern Mandla. Asia Publishing House.

Goodenough, W. H. (1956). Componential analysis and the study of meaning. Language, 32(1), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.2307/410665

Gray, R. D., Jordan, F. M., & Greenhill, S. J. (2020). Universal semantic drivers of kinship terminology structure: Evidence from 176 societies. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 2, Article e42. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2020.41

Holy, L. (1996). Anthropological perspectives on kinship. Pluto Press.

Homans, G. C., & Schneider, D. M. (1955). Marriage, authority, and final causes: A study of unilateral cross-cousin marriage. Free Press.

Iyer, L. A. K. (1939). The Travancore tribes and castes. Government Press.

Jaede, R., Munazir, S., & Talib, M. (2016). Kinship through the parallel lines: Probing the social and biological debate. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, 8(3), 452–473.

Jones, D. (2010). Human kinship, from conceptual structure to grammar. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(5), 367–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000961

Jones, D. (2018). Kinship in mind: Three approaches. In W. Shapiro (Ed.), Focality and extension in kinship: Essays in memory of Harold W. Scheffler (pp. 343–367). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/FEK.11.2018

Kanwal, T., Haroon, H., Khan, U. A., & Arif, M. (2025). Linguistic diversity in kinship terminology: A study of cultural evolution across regions. Journal of Asian Studies, 14(2).

Karve, I. (1953). Kinship organization in India. Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute.

Kumar, D., & Lobo, L. (2022). Tribes of Western India: A comparative study of their social structure. Routledge.

Lamb, S. M. (1965). Kinship terminology and linguistic structure. American Anthropologist, 67(5, Part 2), 37–64.

Leach, E. R. (1954). Political systems of highland Burma: A study of Kachin social structure. G. Bell and Sons.

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship (J. H. Bell, J. R. von Sturmer, & R. Needham, Trans.). Beacon Press. (Original work published 1949)

Lizot, J. (1985). Tales of the Yanomami: Daily life in the Venezuelan forest. Cambridge University Press.

Lizot, J. (2004). Encyclopedic dictionary of the Yanomami language. Apostolic Vicariate of Puerto Ayacucho.

Majumdar, A. (2018). Kurmali kinship terms and its morphology: An anthropo-linguistic study. Jadavpur Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 2(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330875357_Kurmali_Kinship_Terms_and_Its_Morphology_An_Anthropo-linguistic_StudyMorgan, L. H. (1877). Ancient society. Macmillan & Company.

Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. The Macmillan Company.

Mutharayappa, R. (1993). Socio-cultural factors and marriage among Jenukuruba and Kadukuruba tribes of Karnataka. Man in India, 73(1), 17–27.

Needham, R. (2011). Rethinking kinship and marriage. Routledge.

Noyer, R. (n.d.). Indo-European kinship [PDF]. University of Pennsylvania. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~rnoyer/courses/51/PIEKinship.pdf

Noyer, R. (n.d.). Proto-Indo-European language and society: Kinship terminology. Retrieved August 23, 2026, from https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~rnoyer/courses/51/PIEKinship.pdfRadcliffe-Brown, A. R., & Forde, D. (Eds.). (1950). African systems of kinship and marriage. Oxford University Press.

Rivers, W. H. R. (1914). Kinship and social organization. Constable & Co.

Scheffler, H. (2001). Filiation and affiliation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500428

Schneider, D. M. (1984). A critique of the study of kinship. University of Michigan Press.

Schneider, D. M. (2004). What is kinship all about? In R. Parkin & L. Stone (Eds.), Kinship and family: An anthropological reader (pp. 257–274). Blackwell.

Shapiro, W. (Ed.). (2018). Focality and extension in kinship: Essays in memory of Harold W. Scheffler. ANU Press.

Sharma, A. N., & Dwivedi, P. (2006). Socio-demographic characteristics of the Baigas of Samnapur Block of Dindori District, Madhya Pradesh. Anthropologist, 8(3), 203–206.

Sinha, P., Sarma, B., & Purkayastha, B. S. (2012). Kinship terms in Nepali language and its morphology. International Journal of Computer Applications, 58(9). http://research.ijcaonline.org/volume58/number9/pxc3883546.pdfSoni, A. (2015). Baiga, a visual ethnography. Indira Gandhi National Tribal University.

Sreenathan, M. (2001). The Jarawas: Language and culture. Anthropological Survey of India.

Stepanova, E. V. (2020). Kinship terminology and social structure: A comparative study. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 29(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.16995/ajec.2020.123

Tezpur University. (2026). Introduction to family and kinship (MSO 102, Block II). http://www.tezu.ernet.in

Trautmann, T. R. (1983). Dravidian kinship. Cambridge University Press.

Trivedi, H. R. (1985). The Mers of Saurashtra revisited and studied in the light of socio-cultural change and cross-cousin marriage. Concept Publishing Company.

Tylor, E. B. (1889). On a method of investigating the development of institutions; applied to laws of marriage and descent. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 18, 245–272.

Uberoi, P. (Ed.). (1994). Family, kinship and marriage in India. Oxford University Press.

Vajda, E. (n.d.). Semantics. Linguistics 201: Introduction to Linguistics, Western Washington University. https://pandora.cii.wwu.edu/vajda/ling201/test3materials/semantics.htm

Vihman, M. M. (n.d.). Working papers [PDF]. Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, University of California, Berkeley. https://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~survey/documents/publications/Vihman.009.005-extract.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Niteenkumar Janbaji Ramteke, T. V. Kattimani, & Ranju Hasini Sahoo. (2026). Morphology and Cultural Interpretation of Baigani Kinship Terminology: A Comparative Study with Hindi and Marathi. Journal of Studies in Dynamics and Change (JSDC), 13(1), 47–61. Retrieved from https://jsdconline.com/journal/jsdc/index.php/home/article/view/140