An Assessment of Availability of Household Amenities and Ownership in Uttarakhand

Authors

  • Madhu Bisht Faculty Doon University
  • Paridhi Kapoor Research Scholar, Doon University

Keywords:

Well-beingQuality of life, Standard of living, Economic Development, Social Development, Housing Amenities

Abstract

Performance of any country is not just its economic development but also its social development. Quality of life or well-being is a multidimensional approach and leads to social development in narrow sense  and sustainable economic development in broader sense. Quality of life is a subjective measure uses subjective happiness indices by asking people about the living conditions, life satisfaction, happiness and pain and assessing it subjectively. It is helpful in measuring Human Development Index,  Index of Well Being, Gross Happiness Index.The standard of living of a person is not determined only by himself or according to his own whims and desires. He has also to consider what society expects from him. There are number of factors on which the quality of life or living condition of an individual depends such as income, size of the family, education, taste and temperament, social customs, general price level, family support like financing of education, housing facilities, structure of family or households structure also plays a significant role in determining one’s living standard as many studies from the past reveal. The well-being of a person depends on the availability of basic household amenities and assets which are essential for making day-to-day activities easier and to maintain the quality of life of an individual or household.

 In this paper, well-being in Uttarakhand is evaluated by assessing the changing scenario in quality of life or living conditions of households using 17 indicators based on the availability of household amenities and household assets in rural and urban areas of Uttarakhand between the years 2001 and 2011.

References

Browning, R. A. Wellbeing and its improvibility as a national goal. In P. M. HAL KENDIG (Ed.), Population Ageing and Australia's Future. ANU press.

Das, D. (2008). Urban Quality of life : A case study of Guwahati. Social indicators research , 88, 297-310.

Fledstein, M. (1997). Policies to grow the U.S. standard of living. Business economics , 32, 33-37.

H.Steckle, R. (2008). Biological measures of standard ogf living. The journal of economic perspective , 22, 129-152.

Hawkins, J. The four approchesto measuring wellbeing. In Measuring and Promoting Wellbeing. ANUpress.

Mberu, B. U. (2007). Households structure and living condition in nigeria. Journal of marriage and family , 69, 513-527.

Mohanty, S. S. (2014). Suppressor Variable in Determining Targeted Catch of Exportable Marine Species in India. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 4(4), 395-406.

Mohanty, S. S., Prakash, A., Jaiswal, B., & Bisht, M. (2016). Misplaced Prioritisation in Sanitation Battle in India: Some Insights from the Global Experience. Journal of Studies in Dynamics and Change (JSDC), 3(2), 1–8. Retrieved from https://jsdconline.com/journal/jsdc/index.php/home/article/view/27

Sarah C, W. (2010). Analysing wellbeing: a framework for development practice. Development in practice , 20, 158-172.

Steckel, R. H. (1995). Stature and the Standard of Living. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 1903-1940.

Tuttle, F. W. (1960). Standard of living. 35, 184-189.

Zia, R. H. (2013). Multidimensional wellbeing: An index of quality of life in developing economy. social indicators research, 114, 997-1012.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-01

How to Cite

Bisht, M., & Kapoor, P. (2021). An Assessment of Availability of Household Amenities and Ownership in Uttarakhand. Journal of Studies in Dynamics and Change (JSDC), 8(2), 1–24. Retrieved from https://jsdconline.com/journal/jsdc/index.php/home/article/view/85